Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 22.06.2025 00:57

Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
What’s next?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Searching for axions by analyzing X-ray observations of entire galaxies - Phys.org
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Thank you.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
What nonsense did you hear today in India that made you laugh?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
What Gemini app features are free versus paid? [June 2025] - 9to5Google
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
The sun's poles have flipped. A spacecraft is watching what happens next. - Mashable
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
What's an underrated/unknown novel or series that you think deserves more attention?